Important Confessional Statements
Below you will find some of the major doctrinal confessions and statements with which I agree (broadly conservative, evangelical, Bible believing, traditional, orthodox). All of them are very readable and approachable, and well worth the time to read through for any Christian. My own short take on some of such things is at the end:
The Baptist Faith and Message 2000 (doctrinal confession of the Southern Baptist Convention):
The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy:
https://library.dts.edu/Pages/TL/Special/ICBI_1.pdf
The Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics (the word hermeneutics is just a 50 dollar word from the Greek meaning 'interpretation'):
https://library.dts.edu/Pages/TL/Special/ICBI_2.pdf
The Nashville Statement (CBMW - Counsel on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood). I encourage you to read it and sign it if you agree with it: I have.
https://cbmw.org/nashville-statement
The Danvers Statement (The rationale for the creation of the CBMW and toward the end its initial affirmations on biblical manhood and womanhood):
https://cbmw.org/about/danvers-statement
Powerful stuff - every time I read any of them, I get chills up and down my spine and almost always tear up, sometimes weeping openly. Enjoy!
My personal confessions about some of such things:
I have a high view of scripture, and all human reason, experience, (church) tradition, culture, and indeed any artifice of man must necessarily be put beneath God's own revelation to us of Himself and all His Creation in the 66 books of the traditional Protestant Bible, which is the exact same in content, though not necessarily in arrangement, as the original canonical Bible, so indicated first in the Bible itself in concert with the original Apostles of the early church in the first century AD, then defended, clarified, and reiterated by various Church counsels and letters on into the late 5th century AD. The Apocrypha is not included since it is not inspired, but can be useful for history, cultural context, and various other insights if treated with caution while carefully remembering that it is not inspired scripture, hence works of mere men.
I believe in the plenary-verbal nature of the Bible: the Bible is, in the original autographs, completely and wholly (plenary) and in every word (verbal) exactly what God intended to be there. It is God's perfect, inerrant, infallible, internally wholly self-consistent, immutable, authoritative, sufficient, and timelessly applicable revelation of Himself and all His creation to all mankind written by very God himself working through the 40+ human authors who were superintended by the Holy Spirit, yet with God working through the individual author's own personalities, style, personal eyewitness, research, influences, theological emphases, etc.
For a good understanding of the special inspiration of God working through the 40+ human authors of the Bible, see:
https://bbwarfield.com/works/revelation/
It is a heavy read, but a classic that reflects the foundation from which flows, as I understand it, the current mainstream, conservative, evangelical thought on the nature of revelation and God's inspiration through the Holy Spirit that resulted in our Bible, most notably through concursive operation. See also:
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/article/the-young-j-i-packer-as-a-new-warfield/
Some of the above links are from a Reformed tradition. However, I feel confident they are sound. I am very comfortable with all the above and feel they confess many essential and universal truths about our Christian faith and practice, even though I am not, broadly speaking, a Calvinist, or Reformed in its full sense:
I believe God gave all of us the free gift of salvation by grace through faith in the atoning work Jesus Christ did on the cross if we as free agents but repent of our sins, receive that gift in trust truly in our hearts, and confess Jesus Christ to a world in desperate need of salvation.